In their latest attempt to differentiate themselves from
their competitors, Intel has announced their proposal to use facial-recognition
technology in combination with Internet TV to target specific ads to an
individualized audience. This technology was first brought to my attention
while listening to an American Public Media Marketplace segment the other day,
and I was immediately intrigued as visions of 1984’s Big Brother were invoked. Intel’s
product will come in the form of a TV set top box, similar to Microsoft’s
Kinect device for the Xbox 360, that contains a built-in camera that will
recognize the viewer. This allows the Internet TV to deliver personalized ads
based on a specific audience. “So for instance, if it’s your 6-year-old kid,”
the TV might say, ‘Hey Junior, here’s some cartoons you can watch.’” In
contrast, the television would advertise food programs and travel related shows
for myself. “It really is just about personalization, having the ability to
recognize you and then give you options that’ll recognize you,” Michele Reitz, an analyst at Gartner, a global technology research company, explains.
Commentators compare Intel’s foray into the living room to
how Apple revolutionized the smartphone with the Iphone. At this point, the
living room is one corner of the market that hasn’t been captured yet. In a
crowded technology marketplace, personalized Internet TV represents an
opportunity for Intel to distinguish itself from Apple, Google, and Samsung.
However, people’s hesitancy to allow the camera into the intimacy of their
living space represents a hurdle that Intel may have underestimated, as evidenced
in the comments below received by Reuters.com. That being said, such reluctance
can be overcome. A Kinect owner explained that when he first purchased the product feelings of paranoia overcame
him for the initial few weeks of its usage, but “For now, I’ve gotten used to
Kinnect looking at me, just like most people have become accustomed to Google
tracking what they do on the web.”
So what’s the difference? Is it simply Google’s familiar targeted
advertising in a new form? Or is there something inherently different about a
device that tracks and recognizes you? Comments and tweets received by Reuters
illustrate a divided consumer base.“Gee, that’s all we need, for kids to be exposed to
kid-targeted ads constantly while they’re watching TV. . . .,” one user
comments. On the other hand, “Why grind on Intel?! Wouldn’t you want to pay
less each month for only the channels you really watch?? The problem here is
not Intel, it’s the cable and satellite companies that charge for packages
containing useless and never watched channels at a premium!,“ exclaims another commentator.
In any event, the idea of someone or something tracking you every
time you turn on the TV creates a few goose bumps. Then again, if you don’t
want it, don’t buy it. Bear in mind that this is just one example of the use of
facial recognition technology — remember when Facebook introduced a form of
such technology along with its tagging feature a few years back? Intel isn’t the only company seeking to break into the market so future discussions may lie ahead.
"You don't mind talking about it, do you, Dave?" -HAL
ReplyDeleteThis could have some interesting ramifications in other legal realms, I think. If records were kept by Intel -- who was watching, what programs, what time of day, alone or with company, etc -- I imagine those could be discoverable and potentially admissible as evidence in a trial. Also, what if law enforcement wanted those logs? I would want to be very sure there was a strict privacy policy in place before signing up for this service.
ReplyDeleteI think this could get very offensive very quickly. What if the facial recognition software begins to identify people of certain races or body types, or those wearing certain religious garb? Imagine if your TV noticed that you had gained some weight and started showing you nothing but diet pill ads. Or worse, if your TV noticed that you were Hispanic in an election year and started showing nothing but Spanish-speaking Republican politicians.
ReplyDelete